You won't believe what her defense attorney said. Or maybe you will. But this is a new low in sleaze.
July 2 - Sentenced to 3 years' probation for sex with a teenage boy.
One time during their relationship, Batkins told him she was pregnant with his child and that she would "have it." "I was nervous, I was scared," he said
ARRAIGNED Sept 24, 2007 - Janelle Batkins, 42, French teacher at Roseville High, was arraigned a on two counts of third-degree criminal sexual conduct.

When she's old enough to be your mother.
Police said she allegedly "had an affair" with a 17-year-old boy from last summer to the end of the school year. Batkins is married, with two children, both boys.
The boy’s mother contacted the Roseville police in July after finding evidence of the relationship on her son’s computer. The teacher was in a position of authority which makes it a criminal offense.
Detroit Free Press subhead: Disturbing trend, different stigma for male, female teachers, experts say
PRELIMINARY N0v 8 - At a preliminary, the student testified. After his testimony, the judge amended the original charge of two counts of criminal sexual conduct to nine charges. Nearly 50 friends, former students and teachers showed up in court to support Batkins. [TT - which helps to intimidate the victim.] See TT - Link
She will be arraigned Nov 19.
SLEAZE, PURE SLEAZE Nov 9 - The Macomb Daily reported on the testimony with some revealing exchanges about how a teacher's lawyer defends their client.
During [defense attorney David] [Griem's cross-examination, the man said that at one point near the end of their relationship he "was feeling horrible. I was feeling it was all my fault."
Griem retorted, "It is all your fault."
Later in questioning, was this,
The man said that he had shared text messages over the computer and his phone with three of his friends, to which Griem asked if he that made him feel "important" or a "real stud" among his friends.
"No more than I already am," he replied.
The man acknowledged that he and his mother have contacted a civil attorney in connection with the case.
It was unclear by the man's testimony when school officials first learned of the relationship. He testified that he told a male teacher, but said, "I didn't get any help there."
One time during their relationship, Batkins told him she was pregnant with his child and that she would "have it." "I was nervous, I was scared," he said.
TT - reaction.NOT GUILTY PLEA Nov 19 - A pre-trial hearing is
scheduled for Dec 13. Her attorney entered a not guilty plea in the arraignment today.
GUILTY PLEA May 30, 2008 - Batkins
pleaded guilty to two counts of second-degree criminal sexual conduct. While the relationship was
consensual non-coerced -- and the age of consent in Michigan is 16 -- Batkins was charged under a Michigan law that makes it a crime for teachers to have sex with students, regardless of their age. She will have to register as a sex offender
[for life, we hope.] Batkins will be sentenced July 2.
SLEAZE II: Her attorney said the law is faulty, but the plea agreement was the best avenue for his client.
"If it wasn't for this statute, it would have been no harm, no foul."
TT - Anyone who doesn't see the harm in a 42-year-old woman manipulating a 17-year-old boy and then allowing her attorney to claim it was the boy's fault, is, frankly, scum.SENTENCED (SORTA) July 2 - Batkins was
sentenced to three years' probation and must register as a sex offender.
Batkins waived her right to speak at her sentencing. However, her husband, Brian Batkins, addressed the courtroom filled with Janelle Batkins' family, friends and former co-workers who primarily all wore yellow, her favorite color.
The victim's mother also addressed the court with her son at her side.
"As parents, this situation has been a nightmare," said the mother, 43. "Everyone thinks their children are safe in school. This has become an epidemic of teachers having a relationship with students. She doesn't think she did anything wrong.
"As a community, we should not tolerate this."
Prosecutor Molly Zappitell said the prosecutor's office sought "incarceration" in this case, whether it was prison, jail or a tether. She said she was "very surprised" by the sentencing because of the case's circumstances. "It wasn't a one-time incident," Zappitell said. "That is a serious offense."
TT - We will look for the name of the lowercase judge™.The lowercase judge™ is Macomb County Circuit Court judge Mark Switalski who said,
“(She’s) an ideal candidate for probation based on her lack of record and prior history,” Switalski said. “She’s clearly made a terrible mistake. She’s been humiliated and ridiculed. She’s shamed before her sons. I don’t know what the effect has been on her marriage.”
Each count is a 15-year felony. Switalski’s decision not to sentence her to jail time or put her on a tether also came down after he earlier read a report from a doctor who evaluated her. The judge did not read the report in the courtroom. “He does not view her as a predator,” the judge said.
As for the mother, she said her son couldn’t go away to college like he wanted, electing to attend Macomb Community College. “He can’t sleep at night. He is so irritable,” she said. “He got harassed at school, college, work.” The case attracted so much attention, the family pulled their younger son out of the Roseville Community Schools district.
TT - Picture of Batkins with her husband here. We're looking for a picture for the lowercase judge™. A lowercase judge™ is one undeserving of the honorific capitialization of a title.