Caught in the Blazer at the rear of Friendly's Ice Cream Shop.
Arrested again in March for contacting the girl. Bond revoked.

Jan 25, 2008 - Todd Sheerer, 29, a music teacher and band director at Warwick High School, was arrested and charged with corruption of minors for allegedly engaging in a yearlong sexual relationship with one of his students. The sex acts with the girl began January 2007. The girl is now 17-years-old.
An anonymous caller notified police shortly before 4 p.m. that two people were "engaged in sexual acts" in a sport-utility vehicle in the parking lot of a restaurant. When a police officer knocked on the window of the SUV, Sheerer got out of the back seat with his pants unzipped. He told the officer that he was a Warwick teacher and that the female in the back seat with him was 19. That was on Friday.
When police interviewed the girl on Monday, they learned that several similar sex acts had occurred in parking lots of businesses, including a sports bar, a quarry, a hotel and an auto repair shop. The two met four or five times a week. She was 17. Police say three other communities are expected to file similar charges against Sheerer in connection with the alleged sexual relationship.
Full Name: Todd Nicholas Sheerer
LEGAL NOTE: Pennsylvania law states that anyone 18 and older engaging in any sexual act with someone younger than 18 can be charged with corruption of minors. [A first degree misdemeanor.] Had the girl been younger than 16 when this started, it could have been considered statutory rape.. - From WHP CBS 21
Sheerer is the second Warwick staff member in recent years to be charged in connection with alleged sexual contact with a Warwick student. A former girls' coach Troy R. May was sentenced in 2005 to 8½ to 30 years in prison after pleading guilty to charges stemming from his relationship with a 15-year-old basketball player in 2003. - From Intelligencer Journal
Jan 17 - Warwick hosts district band festival for first time in 21 years
Jan 29 - Three more municipal police departments have filed charges against Sheerer. Police in Manheim, ititz boroughs and Penn Township Monday have charged Sheerer with corruption of minors for allegedly engaging in sex acts with the 17-year-old girl who was a member of the band.
Warwick School District superintendent John George declined to comment on Sheerer's employment status or even if the district has begun an internal investigation.
"All personnel have the right to due process. The Warwick School District is compelled to honor those rights," George said in a prepared statement. "Therefore, no additional comments will be made until the appropriate time."
TT - There is absolutely no legal restriction on releasing information about the teacher's employment status or disclosing whether or not the district is investigating. There is, however, a very good reason why people in the community should ask how a teacher and a student could carry on a sexual relationship for a whole year and no other educator seems to have reported their suspicions to police. The first police knew about it was an anonymous phone call. Someone ought to ask if any educator at the school reported their suspicions to the administration.ARRAIGNMENT Jan 31 - Sheerer
arrived approximately 45 minutes early, walking hand-in-hand with his wife and wearing dark sunglasses. Durng questioning, Sheerer's wife offered her husband an occasional pat on the back as a show of support.
During Monday's arraignment, Sheerer confirmed for the judge that he was married with one child, that he has been suspended from his teaching position at Warwick High School, and that he has no prior convictions.
The key components as to why the five police departments have gone with corruption of minors charges at this stage in the investigation, according to one investigator, has to do with consent, with the age of the student at the time of each reported incident, and the fact that there is no evidence that "sexual intercourse" took place.I
In this case, police have said that an "inappropriate relationship" began when the student was 15 (January of 2006); however, nothing reportedly occurred that has warranted anything other than corruption of minors charges.
According to one officer involved in the investigation, Pennsylvania currently has no law on the books that deals specifically with sexual incidents between teachers (or adults in positions of trust) and students who are minors.
Feb 7 - A hearing has
been moved to Wednesday, March 19. The school superintendent fielded questions and answers about the case.
ARRESTED AGAIN Mar 1 - Sheerer was
arrested again after he bought a new cell phone, which he used to contact the girl. Sheerer was out on bail and had been told not to have contact with the girl. His
bail was revoked.
BOND POSTED (AGAIN) Mar 5 - Sheerer posted $250,000
cash bail Tuesday. He was expected to return to Garrett's office to waive his preliminary hearing on corruption of minors charges in his case. That would mean his case now will go to court.
District superintendent John George that alerted police about the contact, after learning the two were communicating. Police officers then watched the young woman for three days. They also obtained telephone records, which showed Sheerer's incoming and outgoing calls.Schofield praised the superintendent for his actions.
FIRED April 3 - The school board voted unamously to
fire Todd Sheerer. The board also approved an administrative recommendation to pay the victim and her family $75,000 to cover counseling costs. A statement read by the district superintendent ended with:
"We remain repulsed by the actions of Mr. Sheerer, and we deeply regret the harm that he has caused. Because of Mr. Sheerer's actions, we apologize to the victim and to her family."
PREVIOUSLY INVESTIGATED April 10 - Sheerer was
previously investigated by the school district after two students reported in January 2006 an inappropriate relationship between Sheerer and a 15-year-old girl. The district administration took "appropriate action," according to former Superintendent Dr. Stephen Iovino.
That "appropriate action" included a review of policies and procedures with Sheerer shortly after the 2006 incident, according to current Superintendent Dr. John George, who added that "Mr. Sheerer and the female student both emphatically denied any improper relationship."
The two witnesses were credible.
Dr. George recently confirmed that the two original witnesses have a connection
with two school board members."Relatives of two board members were eyewitnesses to an inappropriate relationship between Mr. Sheerer and the victim," Dr. George
said, adding the witnesses (high school students at the time) reported the
incident to "school officials" in January of 2006, two years prior to Sheerer's
arrest.
The investigation, however, was inconclusive. The investigation was ultimately completed and deemed inconclusive," George said. "The school district administration at that time issued a stern written warning to Mr. Sheerer, stating that any improper relationship with any student would result in his termination."
May 23 - Sheerer was
arrested again for being in contact with the girl.
OOI = Our Own Investigation, a category that includes districts that investigate but never seem to find any conclusive evidence of wrongdoing, despite their lack of trained investigators and knowledge of rules of evidence. What's worse, such districts never contact police who do have trained investigators who have knowledge of the law, rules of evidence, and have the authority to conduct a real investigation.