Board votes to revoke tenure and fire teacher.
Jan 31, 2008 - The West Ottawa Board of Education voted this week to revoke tenure and attempt to fire West Ottawa High School biology teacher Karl Nadolsky for "allegedly ensuring students passed his course."
A test in October had the correct answers to 27 of 34 multiple choice questions italicized. On two other exam questions, Nadolsky is accused of using a larger-size print and of bold-facing the correct answers. During a second test in November, Nadolsky allowed students use a study guide during the exam. The documents were obtained by The Press through the Freedom of Information Act
When a student alerted administrators, it is alleged that Nadolsky named the student and allowed other students in the to berate the person. Administrators have branded Nadolsky "unfit to teach." Nadolsky is is expected to file an appeal with the Michigan Tenure Commission.
The difficulty of actually firing him or revoking his tenure is summed up by a board member.
"The guy should resign, retire and leave," said Bill Bloemendaal, a retired teacher and a 12-year member of the West Ottawa board.
Bloemendaal, however, voted against trying to fire Nadolsky, noting tenure battles are lengthy and that the teacher would be paid during the fight. The board member feels Nadolsky could supervise a study hall or perform another school function.
While they paid him full wages, of course.
APPEAL EXPECTED Feb 1 - He is
expected to appeal and the appeal would be heard by an administrative law judge who presides over tenure cases for the Michigan Department of Education. Nadolsky has been on, what else? paid leave since November.
--------------------------------------------
ONLINE RESOURCE: Administrative law decisions can be found here.
Both Teacher Certification decisions and Tenure decisions can be found at the link. HTML is easier to read.
One Teacher Certification Case
Convicted of assault and battery of a student, a teacher was counseled for "cognitive restructuring" and couldn't be fired. Renewal of a teaching certificate in 2005 lead to discovery that a teacher had been convicted in 1986 of attempted accosting of a minor for immoral purposes. It was a misdemeanor. (He called the minor student at home, made explicit sexual statements to her, left pornographic material and a note on her locker and attempted to meet her where police intervened.)Imagine how the student felt when he continued to teach in Michigan because a panel at Michigan State in 1992 renewed his teaching certificate knowing of his conviction. They revoked his license in 2006.
TENURE CASES are far more tedious to read and while a few are for incompetence, too few are. We can only imagine how horrendously bad the teacher's performance was to warrant revocation of tenure.
-----------------------------------
SUSPENSIONS Feb 26, 2008 - Nadolsky was
suspended twice, once for threatening a student, and once following a sexual harassment charge. Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources Rich
Zuker said he expected six months to pass before getting a court date with an administrative law judge. Once the judge hands down a decision, Nadolsky could be fired or resume teaching, Zuker said.
TENURE HEARING June 25, 2008 - The first
tenure hearing in the district's 50-year history begins today as veteran teacher Karl Nadolsky, 58, fights to keep his job.
Tenure hearings are relatively rare because a buyout often can be negotiated for less money, attorneys say. Only about 50 each year are held statewide and it takes an average of 10 1/2 months to resolve one, according to the State Office of Hearings and Rules.
Nadolsky, like most teachers, requested his hearing be closed to the public.
Fil Iorio, Nadolsky's attorney is sponsored by the Michigan Education Association.
While awaiting the hearing to contest his dismissal, Nadolsky has been paid his full salary of $69,712 and received his full benefits package of $16,198, according to information obtained by
The Press through the Freedom of Information Act. West Ottawa also paid $23,577 for a substitute to cover Nadolsky's classes from Thanksgiving to the end of the academic year.
The judge will have 60 days after testimony concludes to issue a written opinion to the five members of the governor-appointed Michigan Tenure Commission on whether there is sufficient evidence to dismiss Nadolsky.
Either party can appeal the judge's decision to the tenure commission, which reviews transcripts of the hearing and summaries submitted by attorneys to affirm or overturn the decision.
Thirty days after the time for a final appeal lapses, the state posts the resolution on the Michigan Department of Education's Web site, often the only public acknowledgment of the matter, according to the department's communications office.